💀 Marketing Autopsy: How Target Lost "Tarzhay"

Read to stay alive

In partnership with

Welcome to TWISM’s Brand New Autopsy Series!

In this series, we will examine the biggest actual marketing deaths worldwide. While others made expensive mistakes, 70K+ TWISM readers are learning from their failures for free.

Keep in mind that these Sunday autopsies could save your career.

Sponsored -💰 Same VCs Who Backed Uber Just Made This $1B+ Company Available to You.

The Key to a $1.3 Trillion Opportunity

A new trend in real estate is making the most expensive properties obtainable. It’s called co-ownership, and it’s revolutionizing the $1.3T vacation home market.

The company leading the trend? Pacaso. Created by the founder behind a $120M prior exit, Pacaso turns underutilized luxury properties into fully-managed assets and makes them accessible to the broadest possible market.

The result? More than $1B in transactions and service fees, 2,000+ happy homeowners, and over $110m in gross profit to date for Pacaso.

With rapid international growth and 41% gross profit growth last year alone, Pacaso is hitting their stride. They even recently reserved the Nasdaq ticker PCSO.

The same VCs that backed Uber, eBay, and Venmo also backed Pacaso. Join them as a Pacaso shareholder before the opportunity ends September 18.

Paid advertisement for Pacaso’s Regulation A offering. Read the offering circular at invest.pacaso.com. Reserving a ticker symbol is not a guarantee that the company will go public. Listing on the NASDAQ is subject to approvals.

🔬 The Main Autopsy: Target's 200-Day Death Spiral

Patient Details

Brand: Target Corporation.
Campaign: DEI Rollback + "Authentic" Pride Month Strategy.
Budget: $2B+ DEI commitment abandoned + Pride merchandise losses.
Cause of Death: Tried to please everyone, pleased no one.
Time of Death: August 20, 2025 (CEO Brian Cornell resignation announcement).

What They Intended

In January 2025, Target rolled back its diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives following Trump's anti-DEI executive order. The company aimed to avoid conservative backlash while maintaining its progressive customer base through "strategic" positioning and scaled-back Pride merchandise.

What Actually Happened

Target's corporate fence-sitting strategy exploded spectacularly:

The Numbers

Timeline of Destruction

  • January 2025: Target announces DEI rollback following Trump executive order.

  • February 2025: National boycott launches during Black History Month.

  • April 2025: Rev. Al Sharpton meets with CEO Cornell - no concrete outcomes.

  • June 2025: Pride merchandise disaster with placeholder text and minimal store presence.

  • August 20, 2025: Cornell announces resignation amid mounting pressure.

Sponsored - Stop Fighting Your Keyboard. Turn Messy Thoughts Into Polished Copy Instantly.

AI voice dictation that's actually intelligent

Typeless turns your raw, unfiltered voice into beautifully polished writing - in real time.

It works like magic, feels like cheating, and allows your thoughts to flow more freely than ever before.

Your voice is your strength. Typeless turns it into a superpower.

Want to advertise in TWISM?
Reach 70K+ social media pros who read TWISM

Monetize Your Social Media Audience
Earn 30% Recurring Revenue with the Post Planner Affiliate Program

🧬 Failure DNA Analysis

The Root Cause: Corporate Cowardice Masquerading as Strategy

Cognitive Bias #1: False Compromise Fallacy
Target's leadership assumed they could find a "middle ground" between progressive values and conservative pressure, failing to understand that authentic brand positioning requires choosing sides.

Cognitive Bias #2: Sunk Cost Fallacy in Reverse
Instead of doubling down on their successful DEI brand positioning that had fueled growth for nine years, they abandoned it at the first sign of political pressure.

Warning Signs They Ignored:

  1. Customer loyalty surveys showed DEI initiatives were core to Target's brand identity.

  2. Walmart's success proved that discount retail could thrive without progressive positioning.

  3. The 2023 Pride backlash was temporary, but the 2024 recovery was slower than expected.

  4. Internal resistance from employees who valued the company's inclusive culture.

Why Smart People Made This Dumb Decision:
The pressure to appease political winds overrode fundamental brand strategy. Cornell's team mistook tactical retreats for strategic pivots, not realizing they were destroying their core value proposition.

🎭 Myth Busted: "Playing It Safe Protects Brand Value"

The Myth: During polarized times, brands should take neutral positions to avoid alienating any customer segment.

The Reality: Target's "safe" strategy resulted in the worst possible outcome:

  • Lost progressive customers who felt betrayed by the DEI rollback.

  • Failed to win conservative customers who remained suspicious of Target's past.

  • Confused middle-ground customers who no longer understood what Target stood for.

  • Created operational chaos with inconsistent Pride merchandise rollouts.

Data Points:

Why This Myth Persists:
Risk-averse executives conflate controversy with crisis, not understanding that passionate customers (even angry ones) are more valuable than indifferent ones.

What to Do Instead:
Choose your customer base deliberately and serve them authentically, rather than trying to be all things to all people.

🛡️ Failure Prevention Toolkit: The "Brand Authenticity Stress Test"

Before making major brand positioning changes:

✓ Core Customer Analysis

  • Survey your most loyal 20% of customers about proposed changes.

  • Calculate the lifetime value of customers you might lose vs. gain.

  • Test brand messaging with focus groups from key demographics.

✓ Competitive Positioning Audit

  • Map where competitors stand on controversial issues.

  • Identify a unique brand territory you can own authentically.

  • Avoid "me too" positioning that commoditizes your brand.

✓ Implementation Consistency Check

  • Ensure all touchpoints reflect your positioning choice.

  • Train customer service teams on the new brand stance.

  • Prepare internal communications for employee questions.

✓ Crisis Communication Preparation

  • Draft responses for both sides of the controversial issues.

  • Designate a single spokesperson to avoid mixed messages.

  • Create escalation protocols for social media backlash.

Red Flags to Watch For:

  • Executive team split on brand direction.

  • Marketing saying "let's just test the waters".

  • Operations are unprepared for the positioning change impacts.

  • No clear answer to "What do we stand for?"

Screenshots save careers. Which failure lesson are you bookmarking?

Forward this to someone who needs to see it.

P.S. - Have a social media disaster story to share anonymously? Reply with "AUTOPSY" and I'll send you our submission guidelines.

🚀 Brand New TWISM Money Making Program is LIVE!

Want to earn while sharing the social media newsletter 70,000+ marketers love? Now you can! 💰

Our game-changing affiliate program offers:
Up to $1 per subscriber
Industry-rare 20% bonus on referred affiliates
Complete promotional assets
$10 min payout, monthly payments

Perfect for marketers & creators! Turn your network into income streams. 30-day cookies track every conversion.

Ready to monetize your influence and turn social into sales? 🔥

That’s all for today. Thanks for reading. Now…

Go BIG or go home!

~ Josh from “This Week in Social Media”

Brought to you by Post Planner

You are receiving this newsletter because you previously opted in to Post Planner’s emails.

You can unsubscribe in one click below… but PLEASE DON’T! 😂

Disclaimer: Some links may be affiliate links that pay us commissions.

Was this newsletter forwarded to you? 

Reply

or to participate.