In partnership with
{{rh_onboarding_line}}
The executive layer behind your social media decisions
You're already reading TWISM to stay ahead. Pro adds the weekly briefing you actually need: strategic analysis every Thursday, plus full archive access. Built for founders and senior managers who make platform decisions and need signal, not noise. Save 36% on the annual subscription.
Over 70,000 social media professionals are reading this newsletter today!
Welcome Back to TWISM’s Autopsy Series!
Keep in mind that these weekly autopsies could save your career.
Together with EnergyX: 🤝 See their latest investment opportunity.
Meet America’s Newest $1B Unicorn
It just surpassed a $1B valuation, joining private US companies like SpaceX and OpenAI. Unlike those companies, you can invest in EnergyX today. Industry giants like General Motors and POSCO already have. Why? EnergyX’s tech can recover 3X more lithium than traditional methods. Now, they’re preparing 100,000+ acres of lithium-rich Chilean land for commercial production. Buy private EnergyX shares alongside 40k+ people at $11/share through 2/26.
This is a paid advertisement for EnergyX Regulation A offering. Please read the offering circular at invest.energyx.com. Under Regulation A, a company may change its share price by up to 20% without requalifying the offering with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
🔬 The Main Autopsy: Match Group’s “Guarantee” Marketing Meets a $14M Scalpel
Patient Details
Brand: Match Group, Inc.
Campaign: “Six-Month Guarantee” / subscription marketing + cancellation flow
Budget: $14,000,000 (consumer redress payment in FTC settlement)
Cause of Death: A “guarantee” pitch + cancellation friction that regulators viewed as deceptive/unfair.
Time of Death: August 12, 2025 (settlement announced)
What They Intended
Match’s intent was classic subscription medicine: reduce churn and increase paid conversions by promoting “guarantees” and keeping users in the paid funnel longer. (FTC: allegations focused on “guarantees,” cancellation difficulty, and billing practices) In practice, that’s a growth play many consumer apps try, especially when acquisition costs rise, and retention becomes the only organ left to harvest.
What Actually Happened
The FTC said users were misled about “guarantees” (including disclosure issues around terms).
The FTC said Match made cancellation hard and used billing/cancellation tactics regulators viewed as unfair.
The FTC said consumers who initiated failed chargebacks faced retaliation.
Match agreed to pay $14M and to permanently stop the practices described by the FTC.
The story quickly became a broader “subscription trap / dark patterns” case study in mainstream business coverage.
The Numbers
$14,000,000 paid as part of the settlement for consumer redress.
The FTC framed the case as involving deceptive advertising, cancellation, and billing practices.
The settlement resolves a long-running FTC complaint originally filed in 2019.
The FTC’s broader “Click-to-Cancel” rulemaking drew 16,000+ public comments, signaling how hot this category is with consumers.
Subscription churn is already high: 39% of consumers reported canceling at least one paid streaming service in the prior six months.
Timeline of Destruction
2019: FTC files its complaint against Match (case begins its slow autopsy prep).
October 16, 2024: FTC announces final “Click-to-Cancel” rule (industry warning label gets printed).
July 8, 2025: A U.S. appeals court blocks/vacates the FTC click-to-cancel rule (but enforcement via ROSCA/FTC cases continues).
August 12, 2025: FTC announces Match settlement + $14M payment + behavior changes.
August 20, 2025: Mainstream coverage frames the case as part of a broader crackdown on hard-to-cancel subscriptions.
Together with Kajabi: 🤝 Get a grip on your business.
Stop Stitching Your Business Together
Starter apps create friction. Overbuilt platforms slow you down. Kajabi brings your business together, from offers to marketing to delivery, so growth feels clear and focused, not overwhelming.
✨ Want to advertise in TWISM?
Reach 70K+ social media pros • Top-Rated Service • We optimize your copy
🧬 Failure DNA Analysis
The Root Cause: “Retention at Any Cost” Thinking
Cognitive Bias #1: Loss Aversion
When churn feels like bleeding, teams over-weight preventing losses (cancellations) versus building value that earns renewal.
Cognitive Bias #2: Overconfidence Bias
“If legal signed off, it’ll fly” is overconfidence, assuming you can out-process consumer rage and regulators.
Warning Signs They Ignored:
Regulators are publicly telegraphing “cancel must be easy” through rulemaking.
“Dark patterns” are now a named, researched category of consumer harm, no longer a clever growth hack.
Public sensitivity: tens of thousands of people cared enough to comment on FTC subscription rules.
A long enforcement runway: the FTC complaint existed since 2019 (meaning “this risk is theoretical” was medically false).
Why Smart People Made This Dumb Decision:
Subscription teams often optimize what they can measure fastest (retention, revenue) and discount what hits later (complaints, chargebacks, regulator attention). That’s classic present bias: prioritizing immediate gains over future consequences.
🎭 Myth Busted: “Frictiony Cancellation Is Just Good Retention”
The Myth: If you make canceling annoying, you’ll keep more customers, and nobody will notice.
The Reality: People notice. They screenshot. They complain. Regulators write your name on the toe tag.
Data Points:
The FTC explicitly targets practices that make ending recurring charges hard enough to formalize “Click-to-Cancel.”
Even when the rule was blocked in 2025, enforcement pressure didn’t disappear; courts criticized the rulemaking procedure, not the consumer harm narrative.
Consumers are already churn-happy: 39% canceled at least one paid streaming service in six months, meaning friction doesn’t create loyalty, it creates resentment.
Why This Myth Persists:
Because the dashboard lies. Short-term retention lifts look like “wins,” while reputational debt compounds off-screen until the FTC shows up with a clipboard.
What to Do Instead:
Earn renewal through clear value and transparent terms, then make canceling simple so “staying” becomes an active choice, not a hostage situation. (Yes, this is also why “as easy to cancel as to sign up” became the policy north star.)
🛡️ Failure Prevention Toolkit: The “No-Trap Subscription Checklist”
Before launching any subscription offer, guarantee, or promo:
✓ Offer & Claims
Write guarantee terms in plain language and place them where the claim appears (not in a legal morgue drawer).
Red-team your ads for “reasonable consumer interpretation,” not “lawyerly defensibility.”
Treat “free trial” and “guarantee” as regulated medical devices: label everything.
✓ Cancellation Design
Match the cancellation path to the signup path: if you sign up in-app, cancel in-app.
Measure “time-to-cancel” like a safety metric (lower is healthier).
Add a one-screen “pause” option without hiding the “cancel” button.
✓ Billing & Disputes
Never retaliate against billing disputes; design chargeback handling like a compliance process, not a punishment loop.
Audit renewal reminders and receipts for clarity and timing.
Monitor chargebacks and complaint themes weekly; treat spikes as sepsis.
✓ Social + Screenshot Readiness
Pre-write a “terms confusion” response you’d be proud to see screenshotted.
Run a “Reddit test”: would a neutral stranger call this a trap in 10 seconds?
If your growth plan depends on friction, assume a regulator is already watching.
Red Flags to Watch For:
“Legal approved it” becomes the end of the discussion.
Guarantee language that a teammate can’t explain in one sentence.
Product asks for support to “save” users with obstructive scripts.
Screenshots save careers. Which failure lesson are you bookmarking?
Forward this to someone who needs to see it.
P.S. - Have a social media disaster story to share anonymously? Reply with "AUTOPSY" and I'll send you our submission guidelines.
That’s all for today. Thanks for reading. Now…
Go BIG or go home!
~ Josh from “This Week in Social Media”
Was this newsletter forwarded to you?