💀 Marketing Autopsy: Casting Backfire at e.l.f.

Welcome Back to TWISM’s Autopsy Series!

In this series, we examine the biggest actual marketing deaths worldwide. While others made expensive mistakes, you, along with 70,000+ professional TWISM readers, are learning from their failures for free.

Keep in mind that these weekly Sunday autopsies could save your career.

Sponsored -💪 Black Friday is coming and you need the CTV ads.

Kickstart your holiday campaigns

CTV should be central to any growth marketer’s Q4 strategy. And with Roku Ads Manager, launching high-performing holiday campaigns is simple and effective.

With our intuitive interface, you can set up A/B tests to dial in the most effective messages and offers, then drive direct on-screen purchases via the remote with shoppable Action Ads that integrate with your Shopify store for a seamless checkout experience.

Don’t wait to get started. Streaming on Roku picks up sharply in early October. By launching your campaign now, you can capture early shopping demand and be top of mind as the seasonal spirit kicks in.

Get a $500 ad credit when you spend your first $500 today with code: ROKUADS500. Terms apply.

Holiday performance starts now.

🔬 The Main Autopsy: e.l.f. Cosmetics’ Matt Rife Misfire

Patient Details

Brand: e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (e.l.f. Cosmetics)
Campaign: “e.l.f.ino & schmarnes” (legal-themed parody)
Budget: Undisclosed (company invests ~24–25% of net sales in marketing)
Cause of Death: Misaligned talent casting reopened a known controversy, colliding with audience values
Time of Death: August 14–15, 2025 (brand issues “missed the mark” statement and says the campaign “closes today”)

What They Intended

The brand launched a tongue-in-cheek legal spoof arguing it’s “practically criminal” to overpay for beauty, casting comedian Matt Rife and drag star Heidi N Closet as a kitschy attorney duo, an extension of e.l.f.’s value-driven creative playbook. The launch was announced the week of Aug 11, 2025.

What Actually Happened

• Social feeds immediately resurfaced Rife’s 2023 Netflix joke about domestic violence; critics said the casting clashed with a largely female, values-driven audience.

• Backlash spread across Instagram/TikTok and the press, prompting a same-week brand statement that it “missed the mark.”

• e.l.f. said “e.l.f.ino & schmarnes closes today”, effectively ending the creative within days.

• Coverage framed the brand as out of step with its community ethos, with commentators highlighting past concerns about Rife’s responses to criticism.

• The market registered a short, same-window wobble.

The Numbers

• Launch: Campaign rolled out the week of Aug 11, 2025.

• Backlash coverage begins: Aug 13–14, 2025.

• Brand statement: Posted Aug 14, 2025, acknowledging it “missed the mark.”

• Campaign ended same day: “…closes today,” per e.l.f.’s statement.

• Stock moves around the apology window: ELF −2.7% on Aug 14–15

• Marketing intensity context: e.l.f. typically invests ~24–26% of net sales in marketing.

Timeline of Destruction

• Aug 11, 2025 — Campaign debuts.

• Aug 13, 2025 — First waves of critical press/creator backlash.

• Aug 14, 2025 (AM) — Media frames controversy; sentiment turns.

• Aug 14, 2025 (PM) — e.l.f. posts “missed the mark,” signals the shutdown of the creative.

• Aug 15, 2025 — Coverage notes community still unsatisfied; assets lingered on feeds.

Sponsored - 🤝 Start measuring your ad performance to save your career.

Master Marketing Measurement with Incrementality

Still guessing which campaigns actually work? Discover how leading brands cut waste and scale smarter with incrementality. This free guide breaks down how to measure true impact, optimize spend, and move beyond outdated attribution. Download now and start making smarter, data-backed marketing decisions.

✨ Want to advertise in TWISM?
Reach 70K+ social media pros who read TWISM

Book TWISM Ad »

✨ Monetize Your Social Media Audience
Earn 30% Recurring Revenue with the Post Planner Affiliate Program

Become an Affiliate »

🧬 Failure DNA Analysis

The Root Cause: Audience–Talent Value Mismatch

Cognitive Bias #1: Halo Effect
Decision-makers overweighted Rife’s reach with young women and recent virality, assuming positive spillover to brand equity despite clear, documented controversies.

Cognitive Bias #2: Optimism Bias
Leaning on past marketing wins, leaders discounted the probability and speed of backlash, believing humorous intent would carry the day.

Warning Signs They Ignored:

1. Documented past joke about domestic violence, high sensitivity for a predominantly female customer base.

2. Prior criticism of Rife’s responses to backlash (helmet link incident).

3. Immediacy of TikTok/Instagram blowback on polarizing castings.

4. Early signals from brand-suitability tools show misalignment risk.

Why Smart People Made This Dumb Decision:
e.l.f.’s playbook rewards boldness and speed. That cultural success heuristic can devolve into normalcy bias (“our stunts usually work”) and goal substitution (“reach over relevance”).

When leaders compress pre-mortems under time pressure, motivated reasoning screens out disconfirming evidence (that some “edgy” comics are third-rail pairings for certain categories).

🎭 Myth Busted: “If the audience is big, it’s the right audience.”

The Myth: A creator with massive Gen-Z reach will net positive outcomes, no matter their baggage.
The Reality: Audience overlap ≠ value alignment. Misfit casting triggers negative earned media and distracts from your message.

Data Points:

• e.l.f. invests ~24–26% of sales in marketing; mistakes therefore carry outsized ROI risk.

• Apology window coincided with a ~2.7% stock dip across Aug 14–15, 2025 (historicals).

• Brand confirmed campaign shutdown within days, sacrificing planned flighting.

Why This Myth Persists: Reach is easy to count; brand-audience value adaptation is harder to measure, so teams anchor on impressions and CPMs.

What to Do Instead: Pair reach with resonance screening (brand safety + sentiment history + value alignment diagnostics) before contracts.

🛡️ Failure Prevention Toolkit: The “Influencer Anesthesia Checklist”

Before you cast a polarizing personality:

✓ Discovery & Diligence

• Run a controversy audit (past specials, podcasts, responses to criticism).

• Use third-party audience resonance/brand-suitability scans.

✓ Audience–Value Fit

• Validate value alignment (not just demographics); test with panels mirroring your core customer.

• Stress-test scripts and visuals for sensitive categories (DV, health, identity).

✓ Flight Plan & Failsafes

• Stage a red-team pre-mortem: “If this blows up on TikTok tomorrow, what headline appears?”

• Pre-approve kill-switch protocols (asset pulls, creator statements, make-goods).

✓ Messaging Discipline

• Prepare a values-first holding statement and asset-retirement plan; decide in advance whether the content stays up post-apology.

Red Flags to Watch For:

• “But his follower chart is 🔥” (reach > relevance).

• “We can explain the joke” (intent over impact).

• “We’ve already shot it” (sunk-cost fallacy).

• “We’ll ride out a day of heat” (underestimates compounding backlash velocity).

Screenshots save careers. Which failure lesson are you bookmarking?

Forward this to someone who needs to see it.

P.S. - Have a social media disaster story to share anonymously? Reply with "AUTOPSY" and I'll send you our submission guidelines.

That’s all for today. Thanks for reading. Now…

Go BIG or go home!

~ Josh from “This Week in Social Media”

Disclaimer: Some links may be affiliate links that pay us commissions.

Was this newsletter forwarded to you? 

Subscribe to “This Week in Social Media” here »