In partnership with
{{rh_onboarding_line}}
The executive layer behind your social media decisions
You're already reading TWISM to stay ahead. Pro adds the weekly briefing you actually need: strategic analysis every Thursday, plus full archive access. Built for founders and senior managers who make platform decisions and need signal, not noise. Save 36% on the annual subscription.
Over 70,000 social media professionals are reading this newsletter today!
Welcome Back to TWISM’s Autopsy Series!
Keep in mind that these weekly autopsies could save your career.
Together with Immersed
Google, Microsoft, And Meta Partnered with This Pre-IPO AR/VR Startup
Investors have waited decades for what’s next after the smartphone… That wait is over.
Spatial Computing has finally reached the adoption phase.
Until now, AR/VR headsets like Apple’s Vision Pro were too bulky for all-day use. That’s why Immersed developed Visor. Designed for working professionals, this headset is 70% lighter and higher resolution than previous headsets.
The pre-IPO company has already built the world's #1 AR/VR work app with 1.5M unique users. By owning the software, hardware, and a proprietary AI assistant, Immersed is vertically integrating the future of work.
With $25M already raised from 6,000+ investors and a Nasdaq ticker symbol ($IMRS) reserved, the foundation is set.
Google, Microsoft, and Meta have already partnered with Immersed.
You have a short window to invest pre-IPO in Immersed ahead of their planned Nasdaq listing.
This is a paid advertisement for Immersed Regulation A+ offering. Please read the offering circular at https://invest.immersed.com/.
🔬 The Main Autopsy: Gucci’s “Created with AI” Primavera Backlash
Patient Details
Brand: Guccio Gucci S.p.A. (Gucci), a Kering house
Campaign: “Primavera” social campaign teasing Demna’s first Milan runway show.
Budget: Not publicly disclosed.
Cause of Death: They slapped “Created with AI” on luxury visuals and triggered a craftsmanship allergy.
Time of Death: February 23, 2026 (when the AI teasers dropped and backlash accelerated across social feeds).
What They Intended
Gucci attempted to position itself at the intersection of fashion, art, and technology, using AI-tagged imagery to build hype ahead of Demna Gvasalia’s first runway show at Milan Fashion Week.
The move also fits a broader pattern of experimentation (e.g., Gucci’s AI lens partnership on Snapchat earlier in February).
What Actually Happened
The AI-labeled posts were widely mocked as “cheap” and “AI slop,” undercutting the brand’s craftsmanship narrative.
Commenters questioned how synthetic imagery fits a luxury house that sells aspiration rooted in human craft and heritage.
Even when experts argued it wasn’t necessarily “cost-cutting,” the audience diagnosis was brutal: “this looks mass-produced.”
The backlash landed right before a high-stakes moment: Demna’s first Gucci runway show.
Timeline of Destruction
Feb 23, 2026: Gucci posts “PRIMAVERA… Created with AI,” sparking immediate backlash.
Feb 25, 2026: Business Insider crystallizes the narrative by relaying the comments from social media: “cheap,” “tacky,” “AI slop,” with craftsmanship concerns.
Feb 25, 2026: Media outlets frame it as “cutting corners” ahead of the main Gucci event.
Post-backlash: The comment sections become a real-time focus group on whether AI belongs in luxury storytelling.
Together with Miso Robotics
“The Biggest Gold Mine in History”
11_Miso_Partnerships_1200x600.png
That’s what NVIDIA’s CEO said AI investors are tapping into. Market experts say it could send robotics stocks soaring on a "multi-year supertrend." But 39k+ investors skipped Wall Street, backing a private company NVIDIA chose to help make robots mainstream: Miso Robotics. Miso's restaurant-kitchen-AI robots logged 200k+ hours for brands like White Castle. With NVIDIA’s help and a new manufacturing partner, Miso’s scaling fast.
This is a paid advertisement for Miso Robotics’ Regulation A offering. Please read the offering circular at invest.misorobotics.com.
✨ Want to advertise in TWISM?
Reach 70K+ social media pros • Top-Rated Service • We optimize your copy
🧬 Failure DNA Analysis
The Root Cause: Automation Bias in a Craft Category
Cognitive Bias #1: Automation Bias (overreliance on automated output)
When teams treat machine-made output as “good enough” and skip the human scrutiny that protects quality and meaning. A classic human factors research describes automation misuse as overreliance that reduces monitoring and critical evaluation.
Cognitive Bias #2: Optimism Bias (“they’ll see it as innovative”)
Optimism bias is the tendency to expect better outcomes than reality delivers, even when warning signals exist.
Warning Signs They Ignored:
Luxury buyers are hypersensitive to “inauthentic” cues when brands use AI in ads.
Consumers often perceive AI-generated ads as less engaging and more annoying or confusing than traditional ads.
Disclosure can activate persuasion knowledge and trigger suspicion about motive and authenticity.
Internal “cost efficiency” logic can quietly outrank external brand meaning, creating visible quality decay.
Why Smart People Made This Dumb Decision:
When a brand is under revenue pressure, AI looks like a miracle scalpel: faster, cheaper, scalable. But in luxury, your production choices are the product. The audience doesn’t just buy the bag; they buy the belief that humans are obsessed over every millimeter. Undercut that, and the body rejects the transplant.
🎭 Myth Busted: “If We Label It ‘Created with AI,’ The Internet Will Respect the Transparency”
The Myth: Disclosure immunizes you from backlash.
The Reality: Disclosure can increase attention while also activating skepticism if the output feels low-effort or off-brand.
Data Points:
Only 45% of Gen Z/Millennial consumers feel positive about AI-generated ads, while 82% of ad execs thinkthey do. That perception gap is 37 points.
39% of Gen Z report negative sentiment toward AI ads (vs 20% of Millennials).
In a study of 2,000+ participants, consumers perceived AI-generated ads as less engaging and more “annoying,” “boring,” and “confusing.”
Why This Myth Persists:
Because internally, disclosure feels like “we did the ethical thing.” Externally, audiences judge outcomes, not process checkboxes, especially when brand equity is built on human craft.
What to Do Instead:
Use disclosure as a supporting detail, not the headline. The headline must be of undeniable quality. If AI is involved, the output has to clear a higher bar than human work, not a lower one.
🛡️ Failure Prevention Toolkit: The “Luxury AI Creative Triage Checklist”
Before you publish an AI-assisted creative on social:
✓ Brand Integrity
Run a “craftsmanship sniff test”: could this be mistaken for a low-budget render? If yes, stop.
Require human-led art direction sign-off on every frame.
✓ Audience Reality Check
Pre-test with Gen Z and brand loyalists; their reactions diverge sharply on AI ads.
Ask one question only: “Does this look premium?” If it’s not an immediate yes, it’s a no.
✓ Disclosure Strategy
Disclose, but don’t over-index on it: disclosure cannot rescue mediocre output.
If disclosed, pair it with proof of human craft (BTS, artisans, process content) in the same content arc.
✓ Crisis Containment
Assume screenshots are the distribution plan: prepare response copy before posting.
Set a “kill switch” threshold (e.g., sentiment drop + creator backlash) and act fast.
Red Flags to Watch For:
Comments start using words like “cheap,” “slop,” or “lazy.”
Your own team describes it as “good enough for a teaser.”
The AI label becomes the main story, not the collection.
You’re doing it primarily for cost efficiency.
Screenshots save careers. Which failure lesson are you bookmarking?
Forward this to someone who needs to see it.
P.S. - Have a social media disaster story to share anonymously? Reply with "AUTOPSY" and I'll send you our submission guidelines.
That’s all for today. Thanks for reading. Now…
Go BIG or go home!
~ Josh from “This Week in Social Media”
Was this newsletter forwarded to you?