đź’€ Marketing Autopsy: KIA Norway's Rival-Dunk Backfire + Local Posts Can Start Global Fires

Keep your local branches under control.

Author

Joshua Parkinson
October 12, 2025 • Estimated Reading Time: 11 minutes

In partnership with

Welcome Back to TWISM’s Autopsy Series!

In this series, we examine the biggest actual marketing deaths worldwide. While others made expensive mistakes, 70K+ TWISM readers are learning from their failures for free.

Keep in mind that these weekly Sunday autopsies could save your career.

Sponsored -đź’Ş Haus’s ad measurement expertise for the win!

Unlocking Incrementality: A Guide for Marketing Success

In today's chaotic marketing landscape, brands need a reliable way to measure what works and what doesn't. Incrementality is the answer.

This free ebook, “Unlocking Incrementality: A Guide for Marketing Success,” will teach you everything you need to know about incrementality, from the basics to advanced strategies.

Inside, you’ll learn:

  • ‍What incrementality is and why it matters: Understand how it differs from traditional attribution and why it’s essential for modern marketers.

  • ‍How to measure and test incrementality: Explore proven methods like geo experiments and conversion lift testing.

  • ‍How to optimize your marketing spend: Identify your most impactful channels and allocate your budget with confidence.

  • ‍Real-world success stories from top brands: See how leading brands use incrementality to drive growth and improve ROI.

🔬 The Main Autopsy: Kia Norway’s “Elon Went Crazy” Post

Patient Details

Brand: Kia (Kia Corporation; local distributor: Kia Norway)
Campaign: EV3 teaser with bumper-sticker jab at Elon Musk (“I bought this after Elon went crazy”), posted by Kia Norway on Instagram, then deleted
Budget: Undisclosed (Kia later said the post was a local, independent initiative by Kia Norway, not approved by Kia Europe or Kia Corporation)
Cause of Death: A rival-dunk visual that politicized the brand and triggered polarized backlash across EV communities
Time of Death: March 10–12, 2025 (post went viral, was removed; HQ issued distancing statements)

What They Intended

Kia Norway tried to tap into a trend of anti-Musk bumper stickers by posting a rear shot of the Kia EV3 with a sticker reading “I bought this after Elon went crazy,” presumably to woo disaffected Tesla owners in one of the world’s most EV-saturated markets. The post went up and quickly spread.

What Actually Happened

  • According to Kia Norway, the post was simply an attempt at humor, but it triggered backlash among Tesla/Musk supporters and touched off partisan debate; the original was deleted shortly after.

  • International media coverage amplified the controversy, pushing a local stunt into global news.

  • Kia HQ publicly distanced itself, stressing Kia Norway is an independent legal entity and that the post “does not reflect” corporate or European positions.

  • Screenshots kept circulating; the narrative escaped brand control despite the deletion.

  • Discussion was intensified by Norway’s hyper-EV context, where Tesla is a dominant player, priming the story for maximum attention.

The Numbers

Timeline of Destruction

Feb 11 2025: Kia Norway posts the EV3 image with the “Elon went crazy” sticker on Instagram.

Mar 9–10: Post goes viral; removed amid backlash and debate.

Mar 10–11: International press covers the removal.

Mar 11–12: Kia HQ issues distancing statement; emphasizes local autonomy of Kia Norway.

Following days: Screenshots propagate; industry blogs/press recap the saga.

Sponsored - 🤝 Become an email marketing guru for free.

Become an email marketing GURU!

If you want to attend the world's largest virtual email marketing event, now is the time to reserve your spot.

The GURU Conference will feature big names like Nicole Kidman, Amy Porterfield, Lance Bass (for real!), and 40+ More!

It’s two epic days packed with everything email marketing. 100% Free. 100% virtual. Join us Nov 6–7th.

Spots are limited!

✨ Want to advertise in TWISM?
Reach 70K+ social media pros who read TWISM

✨ Monetize Your Social Media Audience
Earn 30% Recurring Revenue with the Post Planner Affiliate Program

🧬 Failure DNA Analysis

The Root Cause: Local Opportunism Meets Global Polarization

Cognitive Bias #1: Confirmation Bias
Audiences on both sides saw what they expected: detractors saw opportunistic “virtue signaling,” admirers saw a justified clap-back, classic confirmation bias that polarizes reactions to the same creative stimulus.

Cognitive Bias #2: Boomerang Effect (Psychological Reactance)
Negative comparative/attack messaging can backfire, strengthening support for the attacked party among their fans and hardening opposition, a well-documented boomerang pattern in persuasion research and advertising.

Warning Signs They Ignored:

  1. Comparative/attack cues escalate quickly on social networks and often spill into politics, especially in the EV space.

  2. Norway’s EV-first market ensures outsized attention to anything Tesla-adjacent.

  3. Local posts can be screen-captured and globalized within hours; deletion doesn’t contain spread.

  4. Corporate activism/partisan cues risk alienating segments and eroding trust if not aligned and governed.

Why Smart People Made This Dumb Decision:
In a cluttered feed, “punching up” at a category leader feels like a shortcut to relevance. But in polarized contexts, attack-style posts trigger reactance and identity defense, hijacking your message and forcing HQ into post-hoc disavowals, especially when governance between local distributors and global brand is loose.

🎭 Myth Busted: Dunking on Your Rival Guarantees Engagement (and Wins)

The Myth: Take a public swipe at the category leader and watch fans flock to you.

The Reality: Attack cues polarize, mobilize the rival’s base, and can boomerang, especially when politics are entangled. Even if engagement spikes, narrative control and brand affinity can suffer.

Data Points:

  • Norway’s market amplifies EV rivalries: 88.9% of new cars in 2024 were BEVs, and 98.3% in September 2025; every EV headline gets oversized attention.

  • Comparative/attack advertising risks negative shifts in attitude toward the ad and brand and can reduce loyalty/repeat purchase over time (industry/academic syntheses).

  • When controversies turn political, boycotts/backlash risk rises and is hard to unwind.

Why This Myth Persists:
Short-term engagement metrics look great; risk metrics are invisible. Local teams prize virality; HQ bears reputational risk later.

What to Do Instead:

  • Compete on product proof (range, TCO, charging access) instead of ad-hominem winks.

  • Use controlled comparatives (substantiated claims) over provocative slights.

  • Align local social calendars with global governance and escalation protocols.

🛡️ Failure Prevention Toolkit: The Local-to-Global Guardrail Checklist

Before a local team posts anything that references a competitor or a politicized figure:

âś“ Governance & Escalation

  • Pre-clear comparative/attack creatives with regional + global comms/legal.

  • Maintain a single source of truth for what constitutes acceptable competitor references.

  • Require a rapid rollback plan (delete, statement, comment policy) for all high-risk posts.

âś“ Context & Polarization Scan

  • Score the post for political/identity entanglement risks (e.g., personalities like Musk).

  • Stress-test against confirmation bias reception: how will opposing camps interpret this?

  • Model boomerang scenarios and set thresholds for go/no-go. (T&F, boomerang effect)

âś“ Market Sensitivity & Newsroom Reality

  • In hyper-sensitive markets (e.g., Norway EV), treat competitor jabs as PR stories, not posts.

  • Assume screenshots live forever; assess whether you’re comfortable with the image in tomorrow’s headlines.

âś“ Measurement & Incentives

  • Tie local social KPIs to brand health/affinity & complaint volume, not just reach.

  • Bonus structures should penalize preventable escalations that trigger corporate denials.

Red Flags to Watch For:

  1. Mentions or imagery of individuals who are political lightning rods.

  2. Comparative claims without substantiation/clear benefit framing.

  3. “It’s just a local post” rationalizations (global visibility is one embed away).

  4. No documented escalation owner if things go sideways.

Screenshots save careers. Which failure lesson are you bookmarking?

Forward this to someone who needs to see it.

P.S. - Have a social media disaster story to share anonymously? Reply with "AUTOPSY" and I'll send you our submission guidelines.

That’s all for today. Thanks for reading. Now…

Go BIG or go home!

~ Josh from “This Week in Social Media”

Disclaimer: Some links may be affiliate links that pay us commissions.

Was this newsletter forwarded to you? 

Reply

or to participate.