đź’€ Marketing Autopsy: Massive Reputation Hit; Influencer-Stunt Gone Wrong at Poppi

Lesson: Don’t Treat Influencers Like Decorative Gimmicks

In partnership with

Welcome Back to TWISM’s Autopsy Series!

In this series, we examine the biggest actual marketing deaths worldwide. While others made expensive mistakes, you, along with 70,000+ professional TWISM readers, are learning from their failures for free.

Keep in mind that these weekly Sunday autopsies could save your career.

Sponsored -đź’Ş Haus’s ad measurement expertise for the win!

Smarter Marketing Starts Here

Most marketers waste money on channels that don’t actually drive results. The secret? Incrementality.

Our free ebook, Unlocking Incrementality: A Guide for Marketing Success, shows you how to measure what really moves the needle—so you can stop guessing and start scaling.

Inside, you’ll discover:

  • The difference between attribution and true incrementality

  • Proven testing methods to measure real impact

  • How to double down on the channels that actually work

  • Case studies from top brands already seeing outsized ROI

Don’t just run campaigns. Run campaigns that count.

🔬 The Main Autopsy: Poppi’s Vending-Machine Vanity Stunt

Patient Details

Brand: Poppi (prebiotic soda).
Campaign: “Soda Thoughts” Super Bowl influencer push.
Budget: Undisclosed, but reports cite “full-sized branded vending machines costing tens of thousands” sent to ~32 influencers.
Cause of Death: A lavish influencer stunt misreading the cultural/economic moment → public backlash → reputational drop.
Time of Death: February 12, 2025 (date of public backlash media reports).

What They Intended

Poppi aimed to leverage its Super Bowl spot to drive buzz by gifting large branded vending machines to influencers, who would unbox and post them on TikTok/Instagram.

The goal: create viral authenticity and share-worthy content that elevated the brand’s cool-factor.

What Actually Happened

The Numbers

  • ~32 influencers reportedly received branded vending machines for the campaign.

  • The hashtag or posts achieved “millions of views” but also triggered widespread negative commentary.

  • The cost per influencer gift was reported (by a competitor) at ~$25,000 each, though unconfirmed by Poppi.

  • Poppi publicly addressed the backlash in a TikTok video, indicating the seriousness of the reaction.

  • The story is now widely cited as a cautionary influencer-marketing failure in 2025.

Timeline of Destruction

  • Feb 9, 2025 – Super Bowl weekend: Poppi’s “Soda Thoughts” campaign debuts.

  • Feb 12, 2025 – Media reports surface the influencer vending-machine gimmick, and public backlash begins.

  • Feb 13–14 – TikTok and Instagram commentary veers from “cool reveal” to “lipstick on a luxury box”.

  • Feb 15, 2025 – Poppi’s co-founder posts a clarification video acknowledging criticism and pledging more community-oriented use of machines.

  • March 2025 onward – Campaign becomes a case study in misaligned influencer tactics.

Sponsored - 🤝 Get the best growth and marketing tactics for free.

Your boss will think you’re a genius

Optimizing for growth? Go-to-Millions is Ari Murray’s ecommerce newsletter packed with proven tactics, creative that converts, and real operator insights—from product strategy to paid media. No mushy strategy. Just what’s working. Subscribe free for weekly ideas that drive revenue.

✨ Want to advertise in TWISM?
Reach 70K+ social media pros who read TWISM

✨ Monetize Your Social Media Audience
Earn 30% Recurring Revenue with the Post Planner Affiliate Program

🧬 Failure DNA Analysis

The Root Cause: Influencer Blindness

Cognitive Bias #1: Bandwagon Effect
Poppi followed the trend of “gift big to influencers → viral reach” without critically assessing whether this tactic matched their brand voice or market mood. The allure of influencer hype overshadowed strategic judgment.

Cognitive Bias #2: Anchoring Bias
The team likely anchored on the Super Bowl moment and the “wow” factor of giant machines, neglecting the subsequent context, economic cost-sensitivity, authenticity scrutiny, and influencer fatigue. The anchor prevented adjustment.

Warning Signs They Ignored:

  1. Early social-listening flagged comments such as “when brands brag more than they give”.

  2. Macroeconomic headwinds: inflation and consumer cost sensitivity made luxury gifts to influencers appear tone-deaf.

  3. Influencer oversaturation: gifting to top creators has declining novelty; without a clear ROI, the risk of backlash grows.

  4. No clear metrics for how machines convert to purchase or community lift.

Why Smart People Made This Dumb Decision:
Because the influencer boom created a “sure win” mindset, brands assumed high follower counts equal impact, and gifting equals relevance. The team likely believed “biggest reveal wins” and slipped into execution mode without challenging the narrative or context.

🎭 Myth Busted: “Big Gifts to Influencers = Big Results”

The Myth: Gifting flashy items to high-profile influencers always delivers viral engagement and brand lift.
The Reality: Without alignment to brand purpose, context sensitivity, and a clear conversion model, such gifts can backfire, costing reputation more than they deliver in reach.

Data Points:

  • 2025 influencer-campaign “flops” are increasingly tied to misaligned gifting and wasteful optics.

  • Analyses show campaigns where the budget is visible but the impact isn’t suffering from poorer sentiment and lower trust.

  • Consumer trust in influencer endorsements is down; authenticity beats show-off gestures.

Why This Myth Persists:
Because the influencer industry has thrived on “reach metrics” and superficial visibility, brands internalize that gift + audience = win. Also, social feeds fetishize the reveal moment, obscuring long-term brand effects.

What to Do Instead:

  • Align influencer activations to brand mission, not just spectacle.

  • Prioritise a genuine story over gifting value.

  • Pre-test perceptions: will consumers see this as “wow” or “out of touch”?

  • Set clear conversion or engagement metrics beyond views.

🛡️ Failure Prevention Toolkit: The “Influencer-Gift Checklist”

âś“ Strategy Alignment

  • Define how influencer gifts tie to brand goals (Awareness → Consideration → Conversion).

  • Ensure the gift feels authentic to your brand and relevant to the influencer’s audience.

  • Ask: Does this gifting serve the audience’s interest or just the brand’s ego?

âś“ Context Sensitivity

  • Run a “mood-check” for economic/market factors (e.g., inflation, cultural sensitivity).

  • Ensure gifting doesn’t appear wasteful or tone-deaf.

  • Pre-screen for possible misinterpretations of the gift or message.

âś“ Audience & Creator Fit

  • Vet influencers not just by follower count, but by alignment: audience demographics, values, past content.

  • Check for influencer risk signals (controversies, inconsistent story).

  • Design the activation so the influencer’s community feels part of the story, not just a billboard.

âś“ Metrics & Measurement

  • Set KPIs: e.g., incremental brand lift, engagement rate relative to cost, conversion lift.

  • Define cost-per-action (CPA) and compare gift spend accordingly.

  • Track sentiment and social buzz, not just views.

Red Flags to Watch For:

  1. Gift cost dwarfs expected campaign ROI.

  2. No clear alignment between influencer audience and brand target segment.

  3. A message or gift could be seen as “luxury excess” in a cost-sensitive climate.

  4. No plan for what happens after the reveal: how do you convert interest into action?

Screenshots save careers. Which failure lesson are you bookmarking?

Forward this to someone who needs to see it.

P.S. - Have a social media disaster story to share anonymously? Reply with "AUTOPSY" and I'll send you our submission guidelines.

That’s all for today. Thanks for reading. Now…

Go BIG or go home!

~ Josh from “This Week in Social Media”

Disclaimer: Some links may be affiliate links that pay us commissions.

Was this newsletter forwarded to you? 

Reply

or to participate.